NGC6888 - Crescent Nebula
The Crescent Nebula (also known as NGC 6888, Caldwell 27, Sharpless 105) is an emission nebula in the constellation Cygnus, about 5,000 light-years away. It is formed by the fast stellar wind from the Wolf-Rayet star WR 136 (HD 192163) colliding with and energizing the slower moving wind ejected by the star when it became a red giant around 250,000 to 400,000 years ago.
October 8, 2024
ENHANCE! I decided to revisit the Crescent before it fell from view this year with my new scope. I figured a nice test comparison of the resolving power of the scope would be fun to see against the widefield Redcat. I’m overall happy with the result, but the guiding woes continue. Finally, after 5 nights, I gathered enough data to make processing it worthwhile. Each night, I set the scope to take 60, 3-minute subframes of the Crescent before it fell too low in the sky, which should total about 15 hours worth of integration time… I tossed out almost half of the 15h of subframes due to streaky stars, egg-shaped stars, and the target occasionally drifting out of the center of the FOV for about 5-10 frames. Last night, I watched guiding for a good hour before I decided to just let it run, and was getting about .5-.6” total RMS… those 20 or so frames came out fine, but later in the night (as has been the case every night with the new scope), something changes. This to me screams “guiding problems,” and no matter how I tinker, I don’t seem to be making any improvements. On two of the nights I imaged, winds were calm throughout the night, and I tossed out just as many subframes as I did on the 3 nights where there was a breeze, so I feel safe concluding that the wind isn’t the culprit. I’ve now tweaked the guiding calibration settings to ensure they’re in line with the recommended settings. I’ve tried recalibrating every night and after meridian flip and letting calibration auto-restore. I’ve ensured good focus and the focal length are correct. I’ve tried exposure times anywhere from .5 sec to 3 seconds to eliminate the effects of seeing. I’ve tried lower and higher gain settings on the camera. I’ve tried higher and lower aggression settings on the ASIAIR. I’ve tried with and without dithering. I’ve adjusted the guiding settling settings on the ASIAIR. Nothing has made a noticeable impact on the amount of subframes I have to toss every morning. I’m going to try swapping out the guide scope to my old guide scope to see if that helps, though I’m a little nervous guiding 925mm focal length with a 120mm guide scope, but at this point, it doesn’t appear I have another choice but to try! If that isn’t effective, I may try an OAG. If that isn’t effective, I may need to inspect/clean/tune the mount. We’ll see!
Technical Details
Imaging Telescope: Orion Optics IDEAL 8
Imaging Camera: ZWO ASI533MC Pro
Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Filter: Antlia Tri-band RGB Ultra Filter - 2” Mounted
Accessories: ZWO ASIAIR Plus, ZWO EAF, ZWO Filter Drawer (Gen 2)
Software: PixInsight, NoiseXterminator, Starnet, BlurXterminator
Guiding Telescope: SVBony SV106 60mm Guide Scope
Guiding Camera: ZWO ASI174MM
Imaging Dates: October 3/5-7, 2024
Frames (gain 101.0) f/4.9 -10c: 160x180” (8h)
Integration Time: 8h
Darks/Flats/Dark Flats: 30/30/30
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 5.00
September 26, 2024
Wide-field of the Crescent completely reprocessed solely in PixInsight.
Technical Details
Imaging Telescope: William Optics RedCat 51 II
Imaging Camera: ZWO ASI533MC Pro
Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Filter: Antlia Tri-band RGB Ultra Filter - 2” Mounted
Accessories: ZWO ASIAIR Plus, ZWO EAF, ZWO Filter Drawer (Gen 2)
Software: PixInsight, Starnet, BlurXterminator, NoiseXterminator
Guiding Telescope: William Optics UniGuide 32
Guiding Camera: ZWO ASI174MM
Imaging Dates: September 6/17/18, 2024
Frames (gain 101.0) f/4.9 -10c: 260x180” (13h)
Integration Time: 13h
Darks/Flats/Dark Flats: 30/25/30
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 5.00
September 23, 2024
This is another new target for me, as it is relatively small and the resolution of my telescope and camera combination is generally undersampled, so it is difficult to resolve much detail within the Crescent itself. On top of all of that, I am evaluating purchasing PixInsight, which is sort of the “industry standard” program for astrophotography these days, as there are many more tools available for processing. It has an incredibly steep learning curve, but with a little time an patience, I’m starting to get better results than what I was previously achieving with Siril. At the end of the day though, I am still somewhat limited by my overall data quality (i.e. undersampling). The Crescent is a commonly imaged target in the constellation Cygnus, and I was able to gather about 13h of data over three nights. I split each session between two targets (Crescent and M31) because the Crescent Nebula drops fairly quickly under 45 degrees in the western sky this time of year (after about 4 hours or so), and I didn’t want to waste any imaging time over a clear night. I should also note that the two most recent nights (Sep 17/18) were under more or less a full moon. Imaging under a full moon is challenging and less than ideal (but not impossible). Many imagers use narrowband filters to reject light pollution and moon glow to make the most of their imaging time. I may consider a dual-narrowband filter for moon-filled nights. The level of signal to noise in each subframe was noticeably different between the moonless and moon-filled nights. Nonetheless, I’m overall pretty happy with the result.
Technical Details
Imaging Telescope: William Optics RedCat 51 II
Imaging Camera: ZWO ASI533MC Pro
Mount: Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Filter: Antlia Tri-band RGB Ultra Filter - 2” Mounted
Accessories: ZWO ASIAIR Plus, ZWO EAF, ZWO Filter Drawer (Gen 2)
Software: PixInsight, Starnet, Photoshop, BlurXterminator, NoiseXterminator, APF-R
Guiding Telescope: William Optics UniGuide 32
Guiding Camera: ZWO ASI174MM
Imaging Dates: September 6/17/18, 2024
Frames (gain 101.0) f/4.9 -10c: 260x180” (13h)
Integration Time: 13h
Darks/Flats/Dark Flats: 30/25/30
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 5.00